Cosmetic Surgery Research - Microsurgery, Reconstruction, Techniques, Risks

Cosmetic Surgery Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Cosmetic Surgery, including details on microsurgery, reconstruction, techniques, risks.


Cosmetic Surgery Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Cosmetic Surgery

Books on Cosmetic Surgery

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Sedation analgesia during office-based plastic surgery procedures: comparison of two opioid regimens.

Cinnella G, Meola S, Portincasa A, Parisi D, Morgese F, Pavone G, Dambrosio M

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. g.cinnella@unifg.it

BACKGROUND: The combination of sedative and analgesic drugs is increasingly being used during minimally invasive surgery. The authors compared the clinical efficacy of two different fentanyl regimens, in combination with midazolam, for sedation analgesia in patients undergoing office-based plastic surgery procedures under local anesthesia. METHODS: One-hundred patients were randomized into two groups of 50 subjects each. Group F1 received a fentanyl bolus of 0.7 microg/kg before infiltration with local anaesthetics; group F2 received the same bolus plus 0.6 microg/kg fentanyl every 45 minutes. All patients received a midazolam bolus of 0.05 mg/kg plus continuous infusion 0.08 mg/kg per hour. RESULTS: High-quality analgesia was obtained in every group, without significant differences between the two fentanyl regimens. Group F2 was associated with lower intraoperative mean blood pressure and SpO2 values compared with group F1. No differences were detected between the two groups in perioperative side effects or postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of opioid did not improve the quality of perioperative patient comfort but acted synergistically with the sedative drugs, amplifying the hemodynamic and respiratory side effects.

Published 23 May 2007 in Plast Reconstr Surg, 119(7): 2263-70.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Cosmetic Surgery Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Cosmetic Surgery Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (March)
  Issue 2 (April)
  Issue 3 (May)
  Issue 4 (June)
  Issue 5 (July)
  Issue 6 (August)
  Issue 7 (September)
  Issue 8 (October)
  Issue 9 (November)
  Issue 10 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



Cosmetic Surgery Books

Body Contouring Surgery After Weight Loss

Body Contouring Surgery After Weight Loss